The Song That Men Should Sing - Kenneth Mackay - TAKE 2

Note: One analysis of ‘The Song That Men Should Sing’ has already been posted. However, I thought I’d post this one as well as the views presented in this are quite opposite to the views presented in the other one, the more points of view the better.

The poem “The song that Men should sing” is a poem by Australian poet Kenneth Mackay in 1899. In it, the author counters the popular notion that peace and general disarmament go hand in hand. It is important to note that the author, Kenneth Mackay, served in the Boer War and had a strong military background.

The poem contains strong themes of nationalism, anti-pacifism, and racist undertones. The mentality of military people is expertly conveyed through the writer’s point of view. The ingrained belief that war is a necessary part of existence is repeated throughout the piece.

Before we continue, it is important to note that that unlike the other Australia-centred poems present in our additional English syllabus, this poem is not apologetic or in the slightest bit remorseful of the genocide inflicted upon the aborigines. It glorifies the wars waged against these tribal people (perceived to be sub-human). It is also important to note that while the other two poems we have to study (Elder’s passing and The Last of his Tribe) never attained fame or publicity in their time, this poem was published in textbooks for white school children for almost 30 years!

The cohorts who fought when the world was young
Have their blood-red legends told,
For a hundred poets have bravely sung
The deeds of the days of old.

The story is writ of the men who fell
In desert and sun-scorched track:
The legions who served their country well -
The heroes who marched 'Out Back' ... 

The first two stanzas speak on the stories often told of the heroes and soldiers who fought for their country during the beginning of Australia’s bastardized ‘colonization’. Many military words are used to invoke a sense of military honour and bravery.

But they tell us now, in their lifeless lays,
These knights of the stool and pen,
We must boast no more of the stirring days
When they fought and fell like men ... 

In the third stanza, we are told that we should glorify these men no more; they exist no longer, they are long dead.  If we continue to glorify them we are justifying our sluggish laziness through the bravery of our ancestors. In simple terms, we shouldn’t live off the glory of those who are long since deceased.

But the tale is best that has oft been told,
If it love of birthland bring;
And the song they sang in days of old
Is the song that I will sing ... 

This stanza serves as an introduction to the end of the poem. In it, the first two lines inspire a direct sense of nationalism. The final line links back to the title as well as the first stanza. In short, what the poet is saying is that he is aligning himself with the men of old, the soldiers who fought. He’s saying that we can’t establish ourselves as a fighting race merely because our ancestors fought; we too must fight.

We won the land from a nerveless race,
Too mean for their land to fight;
If we mean to hold it we too must face
The adage that 'might is right'.

It matters nothing what dreamers say,
When they prate that wars must cease,
For the lustful war-god holds his sway
In these piping days of peace ... 

                In the above two stanzazs, the author begins the conclusion. The first line is of particular significance, predominantly for its colonial tone of racial superiority. Rather than expressing remorse or sympathy for the aborigines, he calls them a nerveless race. The usage of the phrase nerveless race in this context is an extension of the stereotype created by the British that the aborigines were lazy and cowardly.

                The poet proceeds to state that invasion or war will inevitably come. The aborigines didn’t expect it, and neither will they, the modern day Australians. If they wish to maintain this country they love so dearly they must be prepared and ready to fight for it, rather than merely basking in the glory of their ancestors.

                But why do we need war? Why do we need armies? Can’t we all live peacefully?  Is what many of us might say. The poet is quick to dismiss this notion as folly. He states that war will always exist, as it looms even over days of peace. The usage of the word prate ( infinitive tense of prattle) is particularly significant to the poem. Prattle is a derogatory verb used to describe someone talking on and on about something they know very little about. Through this line, his  dislike of pacifists and his military intuition are brought to the forefront.

So our lads must learn there's a sterner task
Than playing a well-pitched ball;
That the land we love may some day ask
For a team when the trumpets call.

A team that is ready to take the field
To bowling with balls of lead,
In a test match grim, where if one appealed,
The umpire might answer 'dead'!

The poet winds up the poem. In the first of the above stanzas, the author begins a cricket metaphor.  He is saying that we can’t merely exist peacefully and carelessly as that is what the aborigines did. Rather, we must be prepared and ready to fight.

The final stanza provides an interesting extension of the cricket metaphor. The bowling with balls of lead is a reference to firing bullets in the battlefield. The team in this context is a reference to an army.

In conclusion, the poet is saying that he has no problem with peace, but merely wishes to be ready in the event of a war or invasion. The coupling of the gentleman’s sport of cricket with the violence of war provides the aforementioned ideology.

The Song that Men Should Sing - Kenneth Mackay - TAKE 1

The Song that Men Should Sing is more of a war poem with Australian Aborigines in context. Written by Kenneth Mackay, who served in the Boer war, understands the plight of the Aborigines, not only in Australia but also in South Africa. This led him to write literature on the Aboriginals and promote the culture of the aboriginals to the world while bringing our attention to the harms done to their society and culture.

The cohorts who fought when the world was young
have their blood-red legends told,
for a hundred poets have bravely sung
the deeds of the days of old. 

First Stanza: This stanza talks about all the battles that have taken place in the past and all the stories related to them. Glorifying war and ‘blood-red legends’ is one of the main aims of the poem as you might have thought. These stories or poems about wars have been narrated by hundreds of poets not necessarily in one timeframe but over a long period of time.

The story is writ of the men who fell
in desert and sun-scorched track:
The legions who served their country well -
The heroes who marched 'Out Back’.

Second Stanza: The second stanza tells us who these men exactly are. Desert, out back… sounds like Australia. Aborigines. Australia is also called Down Under referring to where it is located on the World Map.

But they tell us now, in their lifeless lays,
these knights of the stool and pen,
we must boast no more of the stirring days
when they fought and fell like men...

Third Stanza: The poet admires the Aboriginals in this stanza for not giving up and fighting for their freedom, ’...Fought and fell like men.’ They are called the knights of stool and pen as they fought with shields and swords, and also forced the poets to take up their pens and pull their stools(to sit on) to write about their glory out of respect.

But the tale is best that has oft been told
if it love of birthland brings;
and the song they sang in days of old
is the song that I will sing... 

Fourth Stanza: The poet says that if a tale is told often, it is okay only if it brings love to the birth land. The story of Australia which is brought up a lot including the massacre and the imprisonment of criminals by the British onto this island is what is referenced here.

We won the land from a nerveless race,
Too mean for their land to fight;
If we mean to hold it we too must face
the adage that 'might is right'.

Fifth Stanza: The British easily captured the Australian territory and massacred the population over there, in the name of ‘might is right’.

It matters nothing what dreamers say,
when they prate that wars must cease,
for the lustful war-god holds his sway
in these piping days of peace... 

Sixth Stanza: The poet says that war is something that will go on forever. If people ask for peace and would want war to cease, they can only hope for the war to come back again. Even if there is peace in this world, it can never be considered as true peace as there is always a certain kind of conflict happening in the smaller parts of the society which in turn takes a turn for the worse growing into a conflict. Peace is only an illusion and the illusion of peace shines in front of our eyes mostly when war is closer than ever.

So our lads must learn there's a sterner task
than playing a well-pitched ball;
that the land we love may someday ask
for a team when the trumpets call.

Seventh Stanza: The poet tells the next generations to teach the children more than playing on the field and competing properly. As sports have become the ground to settle disputes among countries as to who is better, it can also be seen as a battleground where bloodshed is prohibited. In time, when humans would need to protect their territories, and everyone should be ready when the time comes.

A team that is ready to take the field
to bowling with balls of lead,
in a test match grim, where if one appealed,
the umpire might answer 'dead'!

Eighth Stanza:  According to the poet the youth should be ready for battle as war needs no reason to erupt. Balls of lead refer to he Cannister Guns which they used back in the day for shooting lead bullets. The game of war, as the poet has put into context is a very revolting idea to the whole idea of peacekeeping and peace itself.


The concept of War and Peace has caused a ton of debates over the last century. War being an integral part of human conflict can never be stopped as there is someone or the other, out there that a majority of humans would fight against, to get their point of view in picture. Defining peace and the concept of peace is very important at this point as no one really knows what world peace is. World Peace is the idea of planetary non-violence. As far as I know, humans are the most non-peaceful mammals ever. Peace would only bring death to all humans, then I guess, the death of all humans might bring peace as well. When we talk of peace we always talk of what is right and what is wrong, but the whole idea of peace narrates the non-sensitization of humans to other views, hence the modern idea of peace is a bit revolting to the main concept of peace itself. Peace is a long way ahead for us humans. Under the veil of glory and war, we must realize that  war might erupt out of nowhere and put nations in conflict. To the everyday man, who lived in the 1900s might have had no idea about the war. He might have been flabbergasted to find out that there is a war happening between countries, and for what reason, well he does not know, he is busy thinking about his future. But what the future brings may be just as unreasonalble and scary as it can be set. Hence, the poet tells us to be ready for war in case there is one.

For a different view on the same poem go here.

Lol. Peace.

Arraignment Of The Men - Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz

As we are introduced to the poem, and particularly its name, it is made very clear, as to what is going to be imparted to us in the five minutes of this beautiful piece of poetry.

This piece is written by Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz during the latter half of the 17^th century. 

Considering the context and the background of the poetess is very important in this case, as there is a brief lapse that distorts the ideas of the 21^st century from the ideas of the 17^th century.

From being a self-taught scholar and poet, she was also a Hyronymite Nun of New Spain. Considered to be a well-known Mexican writer and also a writer of the Spanish golden age, she has carried two literary emblems to her deathbed. Being a woman and realising the potential of women as human beings (with lost hope); through her work, she has made it a point for everyone to realise that women are no less than men.

In this piece a very particular trend can be noticed; that of degrading men and accusing them of the women’s societal problems (which of course make sense). Right from the name of the poem to the last stanza, words such as, ’perverse’, ’witless’, ’levity’, ’crass’, ’creatures’ etc. are either used to describe men or what they do to the women or even the reaction to the thought of woman. 

Considering the context the argument seems feasible. It can be said that the social concept of gender equality didn’t really exist. Women never got a chance to explore or show their talents unless they were asked or allowed to do so.

Men and their dominating nature was narrated in this piece as well. Almost in every stanza the will of men is discussed and the fact that everything that the man wants to happen will happen and has to happen. ‘Witless Laws’ made by men with ‘logic crass’ isn’t exactly the best thing to have in this world. How these laws restrict women from achieving anything and the minimal freedom that is parted to them is reflected after a good reading of this poem.

Women being just objects of use and the hypocrisy that men employ when it comes to women is also a prevalent motif among the piece. The last stanza rightly proves so.

In this very biased piece of verses, she has brought about a certain disruption in the thought of equality and contrasts the point of the poem as she makes the user think of distinguishing man and woman instead of equality. Considering the time period this poem was written in shows us the inhumane gender inequality that existed. With the extreme gender partition that this poem creates, enchants one into thinking of man and woman as two different entities opposed to just human beings. That seems to be the only downside to the poem’s conclusion.