By the Lake is a poem, originally
written in Chinese in the early 8th century. The piece, though
seemingly very complex, actually has very simple and prominent themes. There is
a pronounced historical tone in which the poem progresses. Themes of upheaval
and exile are equally present. The contrast between nature and man is explored
extensively in the piece.
While
reading the piece we must consider the historical events which were occurring
at that time. The poem is set during the An Lushan Rebellion that took place in
China. During this time many people were forced to leave the country owing to
the violence. The poet Tu Fu, had to leave the country too; thus the themes of
upheaval come into the picture.
The
contrast between man and nature is shown by the irony in the question, “For
whom have the willows and the rushes put on their fresh greenery?” The fact
that the plants remain beautiful as ever despite the turbulent times is a
comment on how whimsical man’s fate is, unable to remain constant and peaceful
like the plants. The turbulence of the times is emphasized by the contrast of
how good things were (implied as being prior to the usurper) and how things are
now.
Though the above themes are not
really open to interpretation, countless other themes and meanings can be taken
from the text owing to the surreal sense in which the historical events are
described. One could interpret the poem as being representative of memory or
death; this is primarily possible from reading into the lines at the ending:
“It is human to have feelings and
to shed tears for such things … my way is towards the south city but my gaze
turns northwards”
The vagueness of the above line
is a suitable habitat for sundry strange and seemingly unnecessary
interpretations. However, fret not! If you can read into the poem and suitably
justify your take on the poem, nobody can say you’re wrong.
Thank you. This was helpful.
ReplyDeleteI just wanted to clarify that this poem was written during the An Lushan Rebellion that took place in 755, making it 8th century and not 7th century as given here.
Thank you :)
Delete